WTF?! IndieWire’s Top 100 Movies Of 2007
By Peter Sciretta/Dec. 20, 2007 4:06 pm EST
IndieWire polled “106 leading North American film critics,” and they came up with the Top 100 Movies of 2007. Here is the top twenty films:
There Will Be Blood
Zodiac
No Country for Old Men
Syndromes and a Century
Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days
I’m Not There
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford
Colossal Youth
Killer of Sheep
Offside
Black Book
Once
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly
Eastern Promises
I Don’t Want to Sleep Alone
Regular Lovers
The Host
Southland Tales
Into the Wild
Ratatouille While I do agree that Paul Thomas Anderson’s There Will Be Blood deserves its place near the top of the mountain, the rest of these choices and placements seem very questionable. Usually the films on a majority poll are somewhat predictable, but this listing is chaotic. I’m shocked that Juno (which was critically acclaimed) appears at #97 while Richard Kelly’s Southland Tales (which was trashed by both critics and moviegoers) ranks at #18. Ratatouille which was the best reviewed Hollywood movie of the year is ranked at #20?! Yet Syndromes and a Century is ranked #4?! I’ve been covering all the critic association awards, and the top critic’s top 10 lists, and have never seen a mention of Syndromes and a Century.
WTF?! IndieWire’s Top 100 Movies Of 2007
By Peter Sciretta/Dec. 20, 2007 4:06 pm EST
IndieWire polled “106 leading North American film critics,” and they came up with the Top 100 Movies of 2007. Here is the top twenty films:
There Will Be Blood
Zodiac
No Country for Old Men
Syndromes and a Century
Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days
I’m Not There
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford
Colossal Youth
Killer of Sheep
Offside
Black Book
Once
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly
Eastern Promises
I Don’t Want to Sleep Alone
Regular Lovers
The Host
Southland Tales
Into the Wild
Ratatouille While I do agree that Paul Thomas Anderson’s There Will Be Blood deserves its place near the top of the mountain, the rest of these choices and placements seem very questionable. Usually the films on a majority poll are somewhat predictable, but this listing is chaotic. I’m shocked that Juno (which was critically acclaimed) appears at #97 while Richard Kelly’s Southland Tales (which was trashed by both critics and moviegoers) ranks at #18. Ratatouille which was the best reviewed Hollywood movie of the year is ranked at #20?! Yet Syndromes and a Century is ranked #4?! I’ve been covering all the critic association awards, and the top critic’s top 10 lists, and have never seen a mention of Syndromes and a Century.
There Will Be Blood
Zodiac
No Country for Old Men
Syndromes and a Century
Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days
I’m Not There
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford
Colossal Youth
Killer of Sheep
Offside
Black Book
Once
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly
Eastern Promises
I Don’t Want to Sleep Alone
Regular Lovers
The Host
Southland Tales
Into the Wild
Ratatouille
While I do agree that Paul Thomas Anderson’s There Will Be Blood deserves its place near the top of the mountain, the rest of these choices and placements seem very questionable. Usually the films on a majority poll are somewhat predictable, but this listing is chaotic. I’m shocked that Juno (which was critically acclaimed) appears at #97 while Richard Kelly’s Southland Tales (which was trashed by both critics and moviegoers) ranks at #18. Ratatouille which was the best reviewed Hollywood movie of the year is ranked at #20?! Yet Syndromes and a Century is ranked #4?! I’ve been covering all the critic association awards, and the top critic’s top 10 lists, and have never seen a mention of Syndromes and a Century.